73 Wash. App. 865 - State v. Hefa’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 531 - State v. Williams · 119 Wash. 2d 385 - State v. Smith · 66 Wash. App. 791 - State v. Landrum · 46 Wash. App. 325 - State v. Ratliff · 47 Wash. App. 114 - State v. Goodrich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Restitution" means financial reimbursement by the offender to the victim, and shall be limited to ... actual expenses incurred for medical treatment for physical injury to persons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. C.A.E. · State v. CAE“authority to order restitution is purely statutory”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. CAE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.