Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Wis. 2d 441 - Grant v. State

73 Wis. 2d 441 - Grant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably 93 Wis. 2d 278 - Elias v. State (1980), 154 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. McQuay (1990)

38 state decisions

140197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 52 Wis. 2d 651 - Farrar v. State · 45 Wis. 2d 593 - Cross v. State · Minette v. Associated Chinchilla Breeders, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'are clearly against public policy and cannot be respected by the courts'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 154 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. McQuay · 180 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Young
  2. ““If there were but three counts of burglary before the Court, I suppose the Court might feel they were isolated acts, but the prior record of the defendant together with the revelation that there were other offenses, indicate that your client has had a pattern of criminal behavior over a long period of time. I do not suppose I can say that I will totally disregard his involvement in other matters in passing sentence. To say that I would disregard them would be idealistic. I think that the pattern of criminal activity which has existed for a long period of time must have impact upon the Court’s disposition.” (Transcript of sentencing proceeding, June 14, 1974, p. 2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 450 F. Supp. 575 - Grant v. State of Wisconsin

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.