73 Wis. 2d 703 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2012
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 54 Wis. 2d 361 - State v. Tew · 62 Wis. 2d 194 - Clark v. State · 63 Wis. 2d 120 - Gaddis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record shows, and the defendant has not made a claim to the contrary, that the defendant was fully aware that he was charged with escape. The defendant entered his guilty plea after a full discussion with his attorney, and before accepting the plea, the trial judge questioned the defendant as to his understanding of the effects of his plea. No challenge has been made to the taking of the guilty plea and the record reveals that the plea was voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly entered. At no time during the proceeding did defendant or his counsel assert that he did not know the nature and cause of the accusation made against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Travis“[i]n addition, the information in this case made specific reference to ... the statutory section under which the defendant was charged. This reference necessarily carried with it all of the elements of the offense charged under that section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Travis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.