Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 A2D 680 - In re Sen

In re Sen’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harmon v. Harmon · Potter, Prescott, Jamieson & Nelson, P.A. v. Campbell · Kelly v. Michaud's Insurance Agency, Inc. · Powers v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England · Delta Kappa Epsilon Theta Chapter v. Theta Chapter House Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, the party may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served. Otherwise a party may amend the party’s pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.