In Re Theodore v. Olson and Sandra Ann Olson, Debtors’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2008
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Saco Local Development Corp. · Aetna Life Insurance v. Leimer · Bayer v. Nicola
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the extent to which the order leaves the Bankruptcy Court nothing to do but to execute the order; (2) the extent to which delay in obtaining review would prevent the aggrieved party from obtaining effective relief; and (3) the extent to which a later reversal on that issue would require recommencement of the entire proceeding.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is more liberal than that generally applied in determining the finality of orders in non-bankruptcy proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.