Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 F.2d 115 - Stich v. United States

Stich v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

730 F.2d 115 · 1984

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably United States v. Cooper (2006), Merritt Logan, Inc. v. Fleming Companies, Inc. (1990)

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

17019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1407 · 42 U.S.C. § 247B (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009)

Relies on S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Gray v. United States · Lyon v. California · Fine Paper Antitrust Litigation State of Alaska v. Boise Cascade Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitrary, fanciful or clearly unreasonable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the trial court's action was arbitrary, fanciful or clearly unreasonable. Otherwise stated [the City] must show that no reasonable person would concur in the trial court's assessment of the issue under consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “plaintiffs could adequately prepare to cross-examine [the witness] from already available data.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.