Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 F.2d 1319 - Berner v. Lazzaro

Berner v. Lazzaro’s Empirical Analysis

730 F.2d 1319 · 1984

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

2001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 780

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc. · Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. · St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South Dakota

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the tip merely fails to 'pan out' or if the information itself proves accurate but the stock fails to move in the anticipated direction, the investor stands to lose all of his investment. Only in the situation where the investor has been deliberately defrauded will he be able to maintain a private suit in an attempt to recoup his money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “securities professionals and corporate officers who have allegedly engaged in fraud should not be permitted to invoke the in pari delicto doctrine to shield themselves from the consequences of their fraudulent misrepresentation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]n private antitrust actions, it is the law of this circuit that the doctrine of in pari delicto does not apply where the facts show that the plaintiff is less than co-equally responsible for his injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.