Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
730 F.2d 1417 · 1984
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Forest City Daly Housing, Inc. v. Town of North Hempstead (1999), United States v. Alabama (1986)
21 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1437F · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · 2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 67, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,061 United States of America, by John N. Mitchell, Attorney General v. Hayes International Corporation · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Lennen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an injunction is authorized by statute and the statutory conditions are satisfied the usual prerequisite of irreparable injury need not be established.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) a substantial likelihood that the movant will prevail on the merits; (2) that the movant will suffer irreparable injury unless the injunction issues; (3) that the threatened injury outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the opposing party; (4) that the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest. Gresham, v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423 (11th Cir.1984).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“... a person who is discriminated against in the search for housing cannot remain in limbo while a court resolves the matter. He or she must find housing elsewhere, and once that housing is found, even in a segregated neighborhood, it becomes difficult to disrupt new friendships and other community ties by uprooting oneself again.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.