Brown v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
730 F.2d 293 · 1984
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2003
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garber v. United States · Calder v. United States · Michael A. Mayola v. State of Alabama · McDonnell v. Estelle · Baxter v. Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is based on grounds of which he could not have had knowledge by the exercise of reasonable diligence before the circumstances prejudicial to the state occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harris v. Pulley · Harris v. Pulley“at least two of the witnesses no longer had an independent recollection of the facts of the trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harris v. Pulley · Harris v. Pulley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.