Grunnet v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
730 F.2d 573 · 1984
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2000
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on United States v. Nixon · 17 Cal. 3d 425 - Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California · 69 Cal. 2d 782 - Johnson v. State of California · Julius Goldman's Egg City v. United States · 32 Cal. 3d 197 - Davidson v. City of Westminster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the act necessary to avoid negligence should have occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.