United States v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
730 F.2d 593 · 1984
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably United States v. Green (1999), United States v. Rodriguez-Marrero (2004)
39 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Ungar v. Sarafite · Rasmussen Drilling, Inc., a Colorado Corporation Licensed to Do Business in Wyoming v. Kerr-Mcgee Nuclear Corporation and Kerr-Mcgee Corporation · Simon v. United States · United States v. McKeever
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e will not upset the judge's admission of a recording unless the foundation was clearly insufficient to insure the accuracy of the recording.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the function of a federal trial judge is not that of an umpire or of a moderator at a town meeting.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“knowingly and willfully [give] false testimony.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.