Franklin v. State of New Mexico Department of Human Services’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2005
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · National League of Cities v. Usery · Fry v. United States · Slade v. Slade · Edgar v. Fred Jones Lincoln-Mercury of Oklahoma City, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the decision of one court might indicate that the date of dischargeability hearing should be used as the controlling date, the better view is that the law in existence on the date of the filing of the petition should govern.” [Footnotes omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A court is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision unless do so would result in manifest injustice or there is statutory direction or legislative history to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tulifua v. Tuitele“'amendments made by this section shall become effective on the date of the [statute's] enactment' ... indicate[s] an intent for prospective application of the amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.