Shoemaker v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
730 F.3d 778 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Slack v. McDaniel · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Williams v. Taylor · In the Matter of Samuel Winship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Supreme Court has ... clearly established that images morphed to depict children engaged in sexual activity are protected by the First Amendment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gersh v. Anglin“[W]hether the item to be judged is lewd, lascivious, or obscene is a determination that lay persons can and should make.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bolles“for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bolles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.