Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 F. Supp. 369 - Salaz v. Tansy

730 F. Supp. 369 - Salaz v. Tansy’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Illinois v. Vitale · Diaz v. United States · Waller v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The problem with tests that do not recognize the jurisdictional exception is that they allow defendants to abuse the multilevel judicial system which exists in New Mexico and in other jurisdictions. Without the exception, a defendant can plead guilty to all misdemeanor charges arising from a criminal act in magistrate court and never be in jeopardy of a felony prosecution involving similar evidence in the district court____ [RJeason and logic do not support a rule where one guilty of a crime of homicide by vehicle may escape a possible sentence of three years imprisonment by the expedient of pleading guilty to a charge of DWI or reckless driving where the penalty may be as low as a $25.00 fine and five days in jail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.