Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 F. Supp. 2d 1213 - Smallwood v. NCsoft Corp.

730 F. Supp. 2d 1213 - Smallwood v. NCsoft Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Haines v. Kerner · Van Dusen v. Barrack · California v. Arizona · Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. Ohana Control Sys., Inc. · Maeda v. Pinnacle Foods Inc.
  2. “allowing a pro se litigant to receive such latitude in addition to assistance from an attorney would disadvantage the nonoffending party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Henry v. Adventist Health Castle Med. Ctr.
  3. “[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind may be alleged generally.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. Ohana Control Sys., Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.