Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 P2D 1206 - Tully v. State

Tully v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2015

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. State · Roulston v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 231 - Traxler v. State · Arp v. State · State v. Nargashian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f A compels B at gunpoint to drive him to the bank which A intends to rob, and during the ensuing robbery A kills a bank customer C, B is not guilty of the robbery (for he was justified by duress) and so is not guilty of felony murder of C in the commission of robbery. The law properly recognizes that one is justified in aiding a robbery if he is forced by threats to do so to save his life; he should not lose the defense because his threateners unexpectedly kill someone in the course of the robbery and thus convert a mere robbery into a murder.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “he ought rather to die himself than escape by the murder of an innocent,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person is entitled to assert duress as a defense if that person committed a prohibited act or omission because of a reasonable belief that there was imminent danger of death or great bodily harm from another upon oneself, ones (sic) spouse or ones (sic) child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.