Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 So. 2d 1106 - Wright v. State

730 So. 2d 1106 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Malloy v. Hogan · United States v. Johnson · 462 So. 2d 308 - Lambert v. State · 687 So. 2d 1154 - Hunt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Determining whether a confession is admissible is a finding of fact which is not disturbed unless the trial judge applied an incorrect legal standard, committed manifest error, or the decision was contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.