730 So. 2d 1111 - Chevalier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

cited by 3 later decisions

states following

October 2001

most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · 692 So. 2d 755 - Lester v. State · 678 So. 2d 663 - Sanders v. State · 702 So. 2d 403 - Hennington v. State · Rhymes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“is to protect the rights of the defendant by preventing unfair surprise after he has diligently prepared his defense strategy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 766 So. 2d 815 - Williams v. State
“our kidnapping statute requires more than intentional seizing or confining, it requires such acts with a specific intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 790 So. 2d 773 - Conley v. State
“with the intent to secretly confine or imprison”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 790 So. 2d 773 - Conley v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.