Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

730 So. 2d 218

Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 26, 1999

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 1999-02-26

Relies on 730 So. 2d 214 - Ex Parte Hill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-02-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2018

21 state decisions

100199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶2In compliance with the opinion of the Supreme Court, Ex parte Hill, 730 So.2d 214 (Aa.1998), we set aside those portions of our earlier judgment affirming the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ claims alleging negligence, breach-of-contract, and negligent misrepresentation; and we set aside that portion of our earlier judgment directing further proceedings pursuant to the Aabama Litigation Accountability Act. To the extent our earlier judgment affirmed the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ other claims, the Supreme Court has affirmed that judgment.

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.
/730/so2d/218 · .json · Public domain