Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 SO2D 340 - State v. Poole

State v. Poole’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2014

15 state decisions

130199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Florida v. Bostick · 626 So. 2d 185 - Popple v. State · 699 So. 2d 602 - Voorhees v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the absence of any indicia of coercion or intimidating circumstances, police questioning about criminal conduct or activity alone, does not convert an otherwise consensual encounter into an unlawful seizure or detention.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “threatening presence of several officers, the display of a weapon by an officer, some physical touching of the person of the citizen, or the use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer's request might be compelled.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hile it is certainly true that most citizens would ordinarily respond to a police request, the fact that they do so without first being told that they are free to decline the request does not vitiate the consensual nature of their response.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.