730 So. 2d 734 - Janson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · State v. Jennings · Chambers v. State · 645 So. 2d 965 - Young v. State · State v. Kraushaar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When introduced to prove sexual abuse, the videotaped interviews of children are self-serving in the sense that they are testimonial in nature and assert the truth of the children's statements. They are more akin to depositions de bene esse in which testimony is preserved for later introduction at the trial. . . . [A]llowing a jury to have access to videotaped witness statements during deliberations has much the same prejudicial effect as submitting depositions to the jury during deliberations. By permitting the jurors to see the interview once again in the jury room, there is a real danger that the child's statements will be unfairly given more emphasis than other testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.