Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 730 So. 2d 769 - Comer v. State

730 So. 2d 769 - Comer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Taylor v. Illinois · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether a Richardson violation is harmless, the appellate court must consider whether there is a reasonable possibility that the discovery violation procedurally prejudiced the defense. As used in this context, the defense is procedurally prejudiced if there is a reasonable possibility that the defendant’s trial preparation or strategy would have been materially different had the violation not occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]s a practical matter, a trial judge's inquiry into a defendant's complaint of incompetence of counsel can be only as specific and meaningful as the defendant's complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Relevant evidence should not be excluded from the jury unless no other remedy suffices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.