730 So. 2d 813 - State v. Dial’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 1310 - Perkins v. State · Agency for Health Care Administration v. Palm Springs General Hospital, Inc. · 684 So. 2d 831 - State v. Baxley · Hudson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · 720 So. 2d 1095 - State v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rules of statutory construction require courts to strictly construe criminal statutes, and that `when the language is susceptible to differing constructions, [the statute] shall be construed most favorably to the accused.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“it is the total weight of the tablets, which are ninety-eight percent a non-controlled substance, which determines the penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.