State v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2014
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mattox v. United States · State v. McGee · State v. Jones · Conrad v. State · State v. Garrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have said, since the enactment of the above statutes [§§ 546.230; 546.240 and 547.020], especially the latter two, ... that if the separation or misconduct occurs after the retirement of the jury for deliberation and prior to reaching a verdict, defendant is entitled to a new trial even though it be established that defendant was not actually prejudiced. State v. Dodson, 338 Mo. 846 , 92 S.W.2d 614, 615 [1, 3]; State v. Shawley, 334 Mo. 352 , 67 S.W.2d 74, 88 [30]; State v. McGee, 336 Mo. 1082 , 83 S.W.2d 98, 102 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.