Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 731 F.2d 1236 - Matlock v. Rose

Matlock v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

731 F.2d 1236 · 1984

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
June 2009
most recently cited

45 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably Alcala v. Woodford (2003), Serra v. Michigan Department of Corrections (1993)

45 federal appellate ·

350198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Rose v. Lundy · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc. · Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon · Addington v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rises to the level of depriving the defendant of fundamental fairness, the claim is remediable on a petition for habeas corpus relief.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`[e]rrors that might not be so prejudicial as to amount to a deprivation of due process when considered alone, may cumulatively produce a trial setting that is fundamentally unfair.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is clear that the state court will not 'correct' the alleged wrong or 'vindicate' the federal right [that] the return to state court does not further the state's interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.