Gieringer’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2010
4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co. · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Florida v. Royer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have failed to indicate how further discovery that they might conduct could elicit evidence that would enable them to resist summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the substance of those submissions clearly addressed the merits of the summary judgment issue”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.