Goode v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
731 F.2d 1482 · 1984
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2005
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wainwright v. Goode · Gray v. Lucas, Warden, Et Al. · Solesbee v. Balkcom · Woodard v. Hutchins · Caritativo v. People of the State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ssuming that there is such a right [not to be executed when insane], we agree with the district court that petitioner is barred from raising it in this case because of abuse of the writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. Wainwright“The second claim, the attack on the Florida statute, is made on procedural due process grounds. We hold that the statute meets minimum standards required by procedural due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. Wainwright“post-conviction insanity [cannot] be held back as an issue until the eve of execution and then raised for the first time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. Strickland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.