Hill III v. AT&T Technologies Inc’s Empirical Analysis
731 F.2d 175 · 1984
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2003 · most notably Alexander v. Fulton County (2000), Jensen v. Frank (1990)
14 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Delaware State College v. Ricks · United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · Delli Paoli v. United States · Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is only where an actual violation has occurred within that requisite time period ... that under any possible circumstances the theory of continuing violation is sustainable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.