Koontz v. Glossa’s Empirical Analysis
731 F.2d 365 · 1984
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Williams v. Anderson (2006), Olsen v. McFaul (1988)
39 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez · Rose v. Lundy · Picard v. Connor · Engle v. Isaac · Branzburg v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the same fact scenario' " as the federal constitutional claim for which he seeks habeas relief. Shoultes v. Laidlaw, 886 F.2d 114 , 117 (6th Cir.1989) (citation omitted). Clearly, "the habeas petitioner must present his claim to the state courts as a federal constitutional issue--not merely as an issue arising under state law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“{¶ 16} The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution mandates that the state give an accused fair notice of the charges against him to permit adequate preparation of his defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This requires that the offense be described with some precision and certainty so as to apprise the accused of the crime with which he stands charged. Such definiteness and certainty are required as will enable a presumptively innocent man to prepare for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.