Kroupa v. Nielsen’s Empirical Analysis
731 F.3d 813 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 707 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 7 U.S.C. § 3103 · 7 U.S.C. § 342
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Paul v. Davis · Goss v. Lopez · Siegert v. Gilley · Wisconsin v. Constantineau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he threat of reputational harm may form the basis for preliminary injunctive relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Defendants argue that participation in 4-H activities is no more constitutionally protected than participation in interscholastic athletics or extracurricular school activities that have been denied protection in cases such as Walsh v. La. High Sch. Athletic Ass’n, 616 F.2d 152, 159-60 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 939 , 67 L.Ed.2d 109 (1981); see In re United States ex rel. Mo. State High Sch. Activities Ass’n, 682 F.2d 147 , 153 n. 8 (8th Cir.1982). But the analogy is not apt and the governing principles far from clear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“defamatory state action served to confirm and validate what would otherwise have been peer rumor and suspicion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Blake Sch.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.