Grace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. State · Kingery v. State · Ingram v. State · Davidson v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person who knowingly or intentionally takes property from another person or from the presence of another person: (1) by using or threatening the use of force on any person; or (2) by putting any person in fear; commits robbery, a Class C felony. However, the offense is a ... Class A felony if it results in serious bodily injury to any person other than a defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] defendant cannot be conviet-ed of both murder and robbery as a Class A felony when 'both the murder conviction and the enhanced robbery conviction are based on the same bodily injury to the [same] victim.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“Grounds for objection must be specific and any grounds not raised in the trial court are not available on appeal. Grace v. State, 731 N.E.2d 442, 444 (Ind.2000), reh'g denied. The objection must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Espinoza v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.