Atterberry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 2006 OK CR 19 - Hogan v. State (2006), Bland v. State (2000)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hicks v. Oklahoma · Cooper v. State · Ray v. State · Townley v. State · Lovell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is settled law that trial courts have a duty to instruct the jury on the salient features of the law raised by the evidence with or without a request.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. REED v. STATE · CHADWELL v. STATE“[a]n instruction should not be given on any question of law which is not applicable to the evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should conform to the charge and to the defense and testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.