Siggelkow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2025
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Galella v. Onassis · United States v. Meacham · McKinnon v. State · Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc. · Siggelkow v. Siggelkow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“do not themselves authorize the court to issue a [permanent] no-contact order, neither do they ... limit the inherent equitable powers of the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Burwell v. Burwell · Wee v. Eggener“Acts or omissions constituting contempt. The following acts or omissions in respect to a court of justice or court proceedings are contempts of the authority of the court: [[Image here]] (5) disobedience of a lawful judgment, order or process of the court ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'BRANNON v. State“to be free from harassment and constant intrusion into one's daily affairs”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.