Shindle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2012
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Fountain · Stephan v. State · Dorman v. State · Frink v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the court in Stephan did not expressly limit the [recording] rule ... to cases involving the voluntariness of a confession, the court's discussion makes it clear that the court's primary concern was with the problem of involuntary confessions and related fifth and sixth amendment violations(.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Selig v. State“A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another constituting an offense if (2) with intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the offense, the person (B) aids or abets the other in planning or committing the offense....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wagers v. State“[ellaims based solely on ... violations of fourth amendment rights do not call into question the accuracy of the ... verdict ... [or] the integrity of the fact[-Ifinding process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Selig v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.