Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 731 SO2D 1145 - Young v. State

Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2018

22 state decisions

160199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · Peterson v. State · 697 So. 2d 1087 - Wilcher v. State · 618 So. 2d 116 - Stromas v. State · 672 So. 2d 744 - Nicholson on Behalf of Gollott v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) General Rule . For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination but only if the crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which he was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect on a party or (2) involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “extends to and includes the right to fully cross-examine the witness [testifying against the defendant] on every material point relating to the issue to be determined that would have a bearing on the credibility of the witness and the weight and worth of his testimony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) The impeachment value of the prior crime. (2) The point in time of the conviction and the witness' subsequent history. (3) The similarity between the past crime and the charged crime. (4) The importance of the defendant's testimony. (5) The centrality of the credibility issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.