¶1Even if, as the appellant contends, the supplemental jury instruction on attractive nuisance was error, there was no theory upon which the appellant could prevail given the facts and circumstances of this case. See Gibson v. Avis Rentr-A-Car Sys., Inc., 386 So.2d 520 (Fla.1980); Tampa Elec. Co. v. Jones, 138 Fla. 746, 190 So. 26 (1939).
¶2Affirmed.