Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 F.2d 1122 - United States v. Holroyd

United States v. Holroyd’s Empirical Analysis

732 F.2d 1122 · 1984

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
July 2003
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2003 · most notably United States Football League Usfl Imi Laefc v. National Football League Nfl R (1988), Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc. (2001)

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

240198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 26 U.S.C. § 6065 · 26 U.S.C. § 6302 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 26 U.S.C. § 7207 · 26 U.S.C. § 7602 · 26 U.S.C. § 7622

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · United States v. Turkette · Spies v. United States · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court will not adopt a different construction absent clear legislative history contradicting the plain meaning of the words.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.