Jefferson County Community Center for Developmental Disabilities, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 122 · 1984
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Shannon v. P Shannon Ar, National Labor Relations Board v. Parents & Friends of the Specialized Living Center (1989)
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Tisdale v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility District · National Labor Relations Board v. E. C. Atkins & Co. · Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · National Labor Relations Board v. Pope Maintenance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not [do so] as a state-created department or administrative arm of government, but essentially as a private contractor.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficient control over the employment relationship to engage in meaningful collective bargaining”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The composition of the Center’s Board of Directors is established not by statute but by the by-laws of the corporation, which are subject to amendment by a two-thirds vote of the Board. Thus, to the extent the Directors are accountable to public officials, they are so accountable by choice rather than by law. Such an arrangement does not qualify the Center as a political subdivision under the Board’s second test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.