Nos. 83-1643, 83-1644’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2023
3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Berman v. Parker · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Williams v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“which led it to defer to the Secretary's expertise and to conclude that implementation of these programs was not a proper subject for judicial review. In a recent case, this Court reviewed the pragmatic considerations which might influence the Court's decision: Among those pragmatic considerations are the nature of the administrative expertise involved, whether”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United States, 602 F.2d 574 , 579 (3d Cir.1979), and whether the decision is the product of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“political, military, economic, or managerial choices that are not really susceptible to judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.