Ledoux v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 1385 · 1984
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably Polaski v. Heckler (1984), Smith v. Heckler (1984)
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Brand v. Secretary of Department of Health Education and Welfare · Tennant v. Schweiker · Weber v. Harris · Baugus v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[q]uestions posed to a vocational expert should 'precisely set out the claimant's particular physical and mental impairments.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.