Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 F.2d 1397 - Green v. Christiansen

Green v. Christiansen’s Empirical Analysis

732 F.2d 1397 · 1984

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
17
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 6 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Thomas v. Brewer (1991), Vega v. United States (2007)

35 federal appellate · 6 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 17 states

3801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Georgia-Pacific Co. · White v. Pearlman · Smith v. Swope · Johnson v. Williford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'action so affirmatively wrong or inaction so grossly negligent that it would be unequivocally inconsistent with "fundamental principles of liberty and justice”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon or must act so that the party asserting the estoppel has a right to believe it is so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the facts; and (4) that party must rely on the former’s conduct to his injury.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A sentence ... means a continuous sentence, unless interrupted by escape, violation of parole, or some fault of the prisoner, and he cannot be required to serve it in installments.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.