United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 229 · 1984
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably United States v. Ashburn (1994), United States v. Fosher (1997)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5005
Relies on Tuten v. United States · Doe v. Webster · United States v. McMains · Watts v. Hadden · United States v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a conviction may result in the loss of the rights to vote, to hold a public office, to serve on a jury, and to practice various occupations and professions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“prevents the fact of conviction from being used to the youth offender's legal detriment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.