United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 379 · 1984
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably United States v. Moreno (2006), United States v. Antoine (1990)
32 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Roberts v. Florida · Thomas v. United States · Arthur J. Nathaniel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections · Rheuark v. Shaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`undue delay in processing an appeal may rise to the level of a due process violation.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Both [the court of appeals] and the district court have supervisory powers over court reporters including the power to punish for civil contempt in appropriate cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Length of delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Simmons v. Beyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.