Antonelli v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 560 · 1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2008
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Vaughn v. Rosen · Jones v. Nor-Tex Agencies, Inc. · Bowen v. Israel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Antonelli has mentioned no legitimate need for the ... phone numbers, and we can well imagine the invasions of privacy that would result should he obtain them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.