Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 F.2d 645 - Nunn v. Heckler

Nunn v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

732 F.2d 645 · 1984

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
February 2016
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Polaski v. Heckler (1984), Thomas v. Sullivan (1991)

13 federal appellate ·

1801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Landess v. Weinberger · O'Leary v. Schweiker · Rivera v. Schweiker · Tome v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established in this circuit that an ALJ may not disregard a claimant’s subjective complaints of pain solely because the objective medical evidence does not fully support them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although the ALJ may reject testimony on the basis of credibility, such rejection must be supported by legitimate reasons for disbelief and cannot be a guise for circumventing the rule that objective evidence is not needed to support subjective evidence of pain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ALJ's proffered reasons for disbelieving [appellant's] allegations of pain are unsupported, and, in some instances, contradicted by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.