Zblewski v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 75 · 1984
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Sarchet v. Chater (1996), Herron v. Shalala (1994)
46 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Cotter v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for crediting or rejecting particular sources of evidence.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a minimal level of articulation of the ALJ's assessment of the evidence is required in cases in which considerable evidence is presented to counter the agency's position.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we must be sure that the ALJ has indeed made a credibility determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Belden v. Heckler · Look v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.