United States v. Baez’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.2d 780 · 1984
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably United States v. Woods (1989), United States v. Andrews (1986)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc. v. Hungerford Construction Co. · Soyka v. Alldredge · United States v. Baez · United States v. Clayton · Ortega v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“credit toward service of his sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The crime of misprision of felony has four elements: (1) commission of the felony alleged; (2) the accused had full knowledge of that fact; (3) the accused failed to notify authorities; and (4) the accused took an affirmative step to conceal the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defendant's time in custody prior to imposition of sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.