Garner v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “). 7 (2) The B-A Bank always owned a majority, and in October, 1971 it owned all but six of the 405,608 issued and outstanding shares of the B-A Fund. 8 (3) The B-A Fund owned B-A Bancorp which had acquired 73% of the issued and outstanding stock of the American Bank with money supplied by the B-A Bank. 9 (4) Bussey, Pearson and Baker caused the B-A Bank to provide the funds used by Bussey and Pearson to purchase the Citizens Bank Stock in 1970. 10 (5) On January 9, 1970, Bussey and Pearson appear to have entered into a written agreement with B-A Bancorp 3 (the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Garner v. Pearson

2. “and shows that the claim was not insubstantial when brought. See id. Once the court determines that the federal claim is not insubstantial, it has discretion to retain jurisdiction over the pendent claim even if the court dismisses the federal claim. See O'Brien; Reid v. Hughes, 578 F.2d 634 , 636 n. 1 (5th Cir.1978). And whether the state claim would be time barred if dismissed from the federal suit is”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Garner v. Pearson

3. “13 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 3564, at 428 (1975). In 1974, upon motion of defendants to dismiss the federal claim, the district court exhaustively reviewed that claim and held that it stated a cause of action. See 374 F.Supp. 591, 593 . That opinion evidences a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Garner v. Pearson