Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 F.2d 978 - McCauley v. Thygerson

McCauley v. Thygerson’s Empirical Analysis

732 F.2d 978 · 1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2019

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

1001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1452 · 12 U.S.C. § 1453 · 29 U.S.C. § 633 (§ 14 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 38 U.S.C. § 2014 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Arnett v. Kennedy · United States v. Larionoff · Kizas v. Webster · National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ultimately turn[ed] ... on functional considerations of the effect that application of broad notions of promissory estoppel would have in light of the congressional intent expressed in FHLMC's enabling act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “respect for congressional intent within our constitutional system of allocated powers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.