Hunton v. Sinclair’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.3d 1124 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If Coleman 's revetment is to be torn down, it is not for us to do it. Rather, we must follow the case which directly controls”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zagorski v. Mays
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.